Exempt v.s. Non-Exempt: Common Misclassification Mistakes



Posted: Thursday, November 12, 2009

by
MMC Inc.

In this article we will assume that all persons have been properly classified as employees and the next question to consider: How should a work position be considered exempt or non-exempt?

A brief definition of each classification is as follows:

Exempt Employee: Exempt from the protections of Federal wage and hour laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and/or the wage and hour regulations of their state of employment. Examples of exempt employees under Federal law are "executives," "professionals" and outside sales persons as defined by the FLSA. Exempt employees must always be paid on a salary basis, not subject to reduction based on the quality or quantity of work performed. The rules regarding deductions from an exempt employees salary are very strict.

Non-Exempt Employee: Generally protected by the FLSA (Federal) and/or State wage and hour laws in the state of employment. Typically, employers are required to pay at least a certain minimum hourly rate and a premium rate for overtime work. They are also a guide for determining which on-the-job hours constitute work, and thus must be compensated.

The Department of Labor estimates that 70% of businesses are in some way out of compliance with the FLSA, and in 2008 alone there were over 23,000 registered complaints, with U.S. businesses paying over $185 million in back wages to over a quarter million employees. Misclassifying employees can have serious financial implications such as unpaid overtime, fines and penalties that can be assessed by federal, state, and in some cases, local agencies.

For this article we will focus on the Federal requirements under the FLSA. The majority of jobs are governed by the FLSA. However, there are some jobs that are excluded from FLSA coverage by statute. It is important to note here that many states have their own regulations regarding exempt status for employees and it is imperative for you to know the rules of your own state. Generally, if a state has its own equivalent of the FLSA employers are required to follow whichever rule is more beneficial to the employee. If your state has its own exemption rules you should speak to your legal counsel about the proper classification of employees.

To properly classify a position as exempt, it must pass a salary and a duties test. Many employers believe if they give a position a fancy title or pay on a salary basis the position will qualify as exempt. This belief has led many employers down a costly road of litigation. It is a requirement to pay an exempt employee on a salary basis. However, simply paying a salary is not enough to make the position exempt.

Under the FLSA, to qualify for exempt status, the minimum required salary is $455.00 per week or $23,660.00 annualized. Exempt employees must be paid a set salary for any week in which work is performed, regardless of the quality or quantity of their work. As stated previously, there are strict rules regarding any deductions made from an exempt employee's salary. If an impermissible deduction is made from an exempt employee's salary, it can destroy the exemption and the federal and/or state overtime regulations will apply.

For example, in California the minimum salary for exemption is $33,280 annually and it is tied to the state's minimum wage. The minimum salary required for exemption is two times the minimum wage, which means that when California increases its minimum wage, the minimum salary required for exemption will also increase.

The salary test is a relatively simple one to meet as either the salary meets the requirement, or it doesn't. Now comes the hard part: the duties test. There are four major exemption categories, which are listed below with a very basic list of the duties required for exempt status.



Read more information on U.S. Department of Labor website: The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Crystal M. O'Brien, Esq. serves as MMC's Employment Law Manager/Corporate Counsel. After receiving a double-degree in psychology and sociology from Oberlin College in 1988, Ms. O'Brien earned a workers' compensation insurance claims adjusting license in 1991. She completed post-graduate studies in Human Resources Management at Portland State University's Graduate School of Urban & Public Affairs from 1996-1998 and earned a Juris Doctorate and Certificate in Dispute Resolution from Willamette University College of Law in 2001. Immediately following law school, Ms. O'Brien served as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Faith Ireland (ret.) of the Washington State Supreme Court. She is licensed to practice law in California Washington as well as before U.S. District Courts in each state. Collectively, Ms. O'Brien has 19 years of litigation experience.

To view her complete bio click here.

www.MMChr.com

This Article has been viewed 1,455 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (2 total)
» left by Nina Kaufman, Esq. from New York, NY 2 years 91 days ago.
As state treasuries dwindle, I'm hearing of an increase in these kinds of employee-related investigations, especially around the issue of unemployment insurance and whether companies are properly classifying their workers as employees or independent contractors. Given the penalities and interest that get tacked on, it can be very lucrative for state agencies to pursue these issues.
» left by kathi 6 days 9 hours ago.
I am not sure if you can help me answer this question or not. I work for a huge company where there is a lot of question to the sick policy. I of cource am hourly and the way. It works is after 6 incidences you get written up, 7 suspended....this can be for a dr appt where you only needed an hour. The management that is all salary is gone quite a bit being out sick. I don't understand why this pollicy doesn't. Hold. Up the them as well. They are the worsr offendors when it somes to leaving the office. Granted they have cell phone and computers but that doesn't always work. If you have any cooments I wouldlove to here them. Kathi in Tacoma
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.