All Employers of California Labor Are Duly Warned
Posted: Tuesday, January 13, 2009
by Crystal O'Brien
MMC Inc.
On November 6th, in Sullivan v. Oracle Corp., Inc., the Ninth Circuit decided a matter that is certain to long implications on employers nationwide.
Oracle, the software giant, hired hundreds of employees it classified as "teachers" to train customers in the use of its products. Apparently, in classifying the employees as "teachers" Oracle also treated the employees as "exempt" from overtime/meal/rest period laws. But in 2003, prompted by a court decision, Oracle reclassified the "teachers" as "non-exempt" and duly began paying employees overtime wages on a going-forward basis. Oracle, however, did not address past unpaid overtime.
In reversing the lower court's decision in favor of Oracle granting it a summary judgment against the employees, the federal appellate court held California has a substantial interest in assuring employers in the state comply with labor laws and not benefit from side-stepping labor laws by hiring out-of-state employees. Thus because Oracle gained the benefit of performing labor in California from its out-of-state employees, these employees were also entitled to the protections of California law prohibiting overtime violations.
The lesson to employers is ageless. Classify employees fairly and correctly as "exempt" or "non-exempt" and comply with labor laws regularly and when any question of non-compliance arises address the same promptly and as fairly as possible.
This Article has been viewed 158 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.